HomeBlogMake vs Zapier vs n8n
Comparison 8 min read

Make.com vs Zapier vs n8n: Which Platform is Right for Your Australian Business?

Three platforms dominate the Australian automation market. Each has a different philosophy, pricing model, and ideal use case. Here's how to choose — without the vendor bias.

Steve Rowlands · LeadLasso · August 2026

I build on all three of these platforms for LeadLasso clients. Each one is the right choice in some situations and the wrong choice in others. Here's the honest breakdown.

Zapier

The most well-known automation platform. Easiest to get started with, most integrations, but most expensive at scale — and the least powerful for complex logic.

Pros
+Easiest learning curve — non-technical users can build
+Most third-party integrations available
+Reliable and well-documented
Cons
Very expensive at scale (tasks add up quickly)
Limited logic capabilities for complex workflows
No multi-step branching on lower plans
Best for: Simple, low-volume automations for non-technical teams. First automation for businesses with no prior automation experience.

Make.com

The visual workflow builder that balances power and accessibility. The platform LeadLasso uses most for SMB clients — it handles complex logic without requiring code, and pricing is much more reasonable at scale.

Pros
+Visual scenario builder — complex logic is manageable
+Much better pricing at scale than Zapier
+Strong error handling and data transformation
+1,000+ integrations
Cons
Steeper learning curve than Zapier
Some advanced features require understanding of Make's data model
Support can be slower than Zapier
Best for: Most LeadLasso SMB clients. Complex multi-step automations, CRM integration, document processing, and anything with conditional logic.

n8n

Open source and self-hostable, n8n offers maximum flexibility and data sovereignty — at the cost of requiring technical capability to deploy and maintain.

Pros
+Open source — self-hostable for data sovereignty
+Unlimited executions when self-hosted
+Maximum flexibility — code when needed
+No per-task pricing at scale
Cons
Requires technical capability to deploy and maintain
Self-hosting adds infrastructure overhead
Less polished UI than Make.com or Zapier
Best for: Businesses with technical capability in-house, data sovereignty requirements (healthcare, legal, finance), or very high execution volumes where per-task pricing becomes prohibitive.

The LeadLasso recommendation

For most Australian SMBs: start with Make.com. It has the right balance of capability, pricing, and manageability for the automations that deliver the fastest ROI — lead capture, CRM integration, follow-up sequences, and document processing.

For businesses with specific data sovereignty requirements — healthcare, legal, or finance — n8n self-hosted is worth the additional setup complexity. For simple, low-volume automations where a non-technical team member needs to make changes without training, Zapier's simplicity may justify the cost premium.

The platform question is genuinely secondary to the question of what you need to automate and why. That's what the AI Success Assessment is for.

Get started

Not sure which platform suits your business?

Request a 15-Min AI Discovery Call